>My opening question is, if you folk know so much (and you do; your pointers
>are awesome) how come you characterize Church of Virus as Hegelian?
That wasn't exactly the intent. I describe Virus as a Hegelian synthesis
because it attempts to combine two formerly opposed ideas: religion
(the thesis) and evolution (the antithesis). "Hegelian" is supposed to
describe the kind of synthesis, not Virus itself.
>Sheesh, that's a pointer to the outhouse hole. Hasn't anybody read "The
>Open Society and its Enemies" by Karl Popper? Or at least skimmed it?
I haven't but I'd appreciate it if you clue me in.
>Evolutionary (pan-critical) rationalism is so entirely foreign to Hegelian
>philosophy, perhaps you will understand my exasperation.
As I understand Hegel's dialectic, it is supposed to describe how
ideas evolve over time, by alternating cycles of conflict and
collaboration. Though his idea of ultimate progress is decidedly
antiquated, I don't think his philosophy is entirely foreign to PCR.
-- David McFadzean dbm@merak.com Memetic Engineer http://www.merak.com/~dbm/ Merak Projects Ltd.