RE: Question

David McFadzean (
Fri, 18 Aug 95 13:09:00 CDT

At 12:43 PM 8/18/95 CDT, you wrote:

>>It has nothing to do with spatial dimensions. Logic does not depend
>>on space or time.
>Then on what does it depend, the limitations of what our finite minds can

Even though our minds are finite, they can still comprehend logic.
You can postulate some other supernatural logic if you like, but
you are living in a different reality then.

>>If God does not know fear as I know it, he doesn't know everything does he?
>>That is the whole point.
>You know what I meant...

No, I don't. You have not answered my question.

>I don't see the relevance of fear, I am not afraid of anything.
>Through God, all things can be made possible, that is the "logic".

That is your logic, not mine, not reality's.

>Is your logic limited to what you know? Or choose to know? Yes.

No, science is logical but deals with the unknown. You don't have
to give up logic in ignorance.

>Can you show me your consistant facts for or against Christianity or non
>Christianity. Are we really more intelligent than our ancestors? Who knows,

Yes, I already have. A global flood is impossible. Stars are billions
of light years away. You just choose to dismiss what I say.

>what we call legend, may have really existed. Who has the right and with
>what evidence can we say otherwise?

Do you believe every legend you read? I don't.

>None have hurt my faith. If anything it strengthens it because I can see
>where the Devil is working.

Do you see the Devil in me? I think the Devil in Christian faith
represents logic and knowledge, the seeds of destruction of all faith.

>I see that you now understand that I walk on faith and not by sight,
>appearances can be decieving. It is God who means everything, and His
>word,which does not conflict with true science. As a matter of fact I have
>only seen the principles in the Bible work. His word has never failed.
>Am I upsetting you?

Yes, I find it very frustrating that you pretend to have a conversation
but ignore everything I say. I present evidence you ask for then you
dismiss it without saying why or just ignore it.

I feel like I'm trying to play a game of chess with someone who refuses
to follow the rules. Why limit yourself to 3-dimensional finite rules
of chess? When you play by your own rules, you always win, right?