RE: Question

David McFadzean (dbm@merak.com)
Fri, 18 Aug 95 13:09:00 CDT


At 12:43 PM 8/18/95 CDT, you wrote:

>>It has nothing to do with spatial dimensions. Logic does not depend
>>on space or time.
>
>Then on what does it depend, the limitations of what our finite minds can
>comprehend?

Even though our minds are finite, they can still comprehend logic.
You can postulate some other supernatural logic if you like, but
you are living in a different reality then.

>>If God does not know fear as I know it, he doesn't know everything does he?
>>That is the whole point.
>
>You know what I meant...

No, I don't. You have not answered my question.

>I don't see the relevance of fear, I am not afraid of anything.
>Through God, all things can be made possible, that is the "logic".

That is your logic, not mine, not reality's.

>Is your logic limited to what you know? Or choose to know? Yes.

No, science is logical but deals with the unknown. You don't have
to give up logic in ignorance.

>Can you show me your consistant facts for or against Christianity or non
>Christianity. Are we really more intelligent than our ancestors? Who knows,

Yes, I already have. A global flood is impossible. Stars are billions
of light years away. You just choose to dismiss what I say.

>what we call legend, may have really existed. Who has the right and with
>what evidence can we say otherwise?

Do you believe every legend you read? I don't.

>None have hurt my faith. If anything it strengthens it because I can see
>where the Devil is working.

Do you see the Devil in me? I think the Devil in Christian faith
represents logic and knowledge, the seeds of destruction of all faith.

>I see that you now understand that I walk on faith and not by sight,
>appearances can be decieving. It is God who means everything, and His
>word,which does not conflict with true science. As a matter of fact I have
>only seen the principles in the Bible work. His word has never failed.
>
>Am I upsetting you?

Yes, I find it very frustrating that you pretend to have a conversation
but ignore everything I say. I present evidence you ask for then you
dismiss it without saying why or just ignore it.

I feel like I'm trying to play a game of chess with someone who refuses
to follow the rules. Why limit yourself to 3-dimensional finite rules
of chess? When you play by your own rules, you always win, right?