He's got it! By George, I think he's got it!
Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/
Author, "Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme"
http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/votm.htm
Free newsletter! Visit Meme Central at
http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/meme.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
Of MICHAEL.FULFORD.HD2O@statefarm.com
Sent: Monday, February 8, 1999 8:05 AM
To: virus@lucifer.com
Subject: virus: 'Faith' in science.
Atheism and Theism; two wheels of the same cart.
It seems that a common thread on the CoV mailing list is one of discrediting
the religious for their blind faith and belief in the teachings of the bible
and of their ministers. For example, a previous poster recanted a time when
he
attended a 'debate' on creationism and evolution at a local church. He was
suprised to see the congregation support the minister's defense of
creationism--even after having heard evidence supporting evolution. In
fact,
it seems that religious faith is a popular and easily attacked target for
the
'scientific' community. Geez, I think it's time to remove the 2X4 from our
eyes before criticizing the speck in theirs...
Yesterday, I visited Richard Dawkin's website. I went to the "books" link
and
there was a short listing of his books with description. The webmaster then
gives you a recommended reading order depending on your goals. One of the
goals was "I want to defend evolution against creationist", to which, the
visitor is then directed to buy "The Blind Watchmaker".
Is there any fundamental difference between this example and a religious
person
who reads the bible and accepts it as truth?
How many of us (general public w/interest in science) quickly validate the
theories and claims made in the popular science works of Dawkins, Gould,
Bloom,
etc., without ever doing our own research or otherwise applying our own
scrutiny and skepticism? Aren't we guilty of this phenomenon called faith?
I've heard, "to know without doing is not knowing"; how many
pseuo-intellectual--would be scientists among us does this describe?
I am not defending the concept of faith or the religious mind. I just think
that in many cases atheists are the evolutionary 'pots' calling the
creationist
'kettles' black. We just open a hole in our back large enough for our
chosen
ministers (Darwin, Dawkins... whoever)to put their hand in there and then
use
us as the ventriliquistic mediums of their work. Regardless of whether
these
scientist/authors are right or not, until we ourselves see it, hear it,
touch
it taste it and otherwise live out these theories, we are reduced to nothing
more than Sunday morning yes men.
Okay off my soapbox for now. This is my first time posting something to
this
forum, so be gentle--I'm a virgin! :)
Michael Fulford
Disgruntled Wage Laborer