At 10:03 AM 3/15/99 -0800, KMO wrote:
>Tit for two tats is a more effective strategy in a noisy environment. In
What do you see as the U.S. military's other options having been at that
point (i.e., immediately prior to dropping the bomb on Hiroshima)?
>any event, nuking Japanese civilians who had no means to retaliate or
>placate the US military machine which was itching to try out its new
>toys and give the Rooskies a scare is not an example of tit for tat. The
>US had already served up a whole mess of tits for their received tats
>prior to those two acts of mass murder.
Ken Kittlitz Administrator, Foresight Exchange AudeSi Technologies Inc. http://www.ideosphere.com http://www.audesi.com personal: http://www.wendigo.com