Robin Faichney wrote:
>> If you move, you're not meditating. But if <you> realize there >> is no you, then you are not moving.
And then, in response to an overly literal reading by KMO, Robin expanded the statement to:
> I'm well aware of walking meditation, which is practised in
> the US and the UK, but I was aiming at maximum concision
> there, and referring to the meditative ideal rather than
> meditation practice. In the ideal state, there may be
> walking, but there is no "you" doing it.
Got it.
Take care.