In a message dated 5/12/99 8:31:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
joedees@bellsouth.net writes:
>
Well you would wouldn't you because you are no chameleon and that's the/your
truth.
Irena
> > > > > No, a chameleon has no color of its own. Remove it from all
> > > > > context and it disappears.
> > > > >
> > > > Does it? Or is it just more difficult to see?
> > > >
> > > Prove me wrong by counterexample. Name me one totally
> > > noncontextual truth (I hope you have better luck than the Hermit!)
> > >
> > Go back to start of our conversation. I was the one who said truth is an
> > illusion. You said truth is a chameleon. You said it a thing I said it
an
> > illusion. Who be chameloned here?
> >
> > Irena
> >
> It's irretreiveably contextual; that's been my point all along, and I'm
> sticking to it.