Re: [Fwd: virus: Religion & Logic]

David McFadzean (
Fri, 19 Apr 1996 10:50:49 -0600

At 04:03 AM 19/04/96 -0700, Marc Connolly wrote:

> If various forms of art don't look like religous expressions or
>attempts to depict ones place in the universe then what are they? Could
>they be simply humans stimulating themselves and that's it? No great
>meaning...just stimulation...colors, sound, touch???

Any useful definition of art must encompass all types of creative
expression which necessarily includes everything from simple
stimulation (as you said) to profound elucidations of the sublime.

David McFadzean       
Memetic Engineer      
Church of Virus