On 28 Sep 96 at 22:35, noctem@centuryinter.net wrote:
> Do anyone have any suggestions on how to make these constraints more
> stringent?
One idea is that the individual should give the name to a third party
who should then give it to you. This eliminates the possibility of
body language or tone of voice betraying something of the
relationship involved. This of course wouldn't be an issue using
email.
>Is anyone willing to participate in such a test? Past results
> were in favor of the practice, but quite frankly I need more data, and I
> need it from people I don't know at ALL, personally. [And if this stuff
> doesn't work, I'd like to stop wasting my time testing it... ;)
For sure. As long as I get to see the resulting stats ;)
> Anyone who wants to collaborate on this should send applicable posts
> to my nym account at envy@alias.cyberpass.net. A PGP key will be provided
> if requested.
A mail is on the way.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Requires PGP version 2.6 or later.
iQCVAwUBMk9dR15rBERarcK9AQE+HgQAnjG7wgSnRH3dZ2jLaLqqIlnsDJzshzfa
vlyWdVkJbcfqW9AEBGAkBaHM0Na8sKwNcFGja1eWt3qLskyBhsjaXplFzaUtSBKk
Qvy2RuQJV/B4cMmYp/e+xykiosp6/JDnmzWnGy76pQxNVbo+CoS2KpcybKtaSQdV
tyMZsnBcr3U=
=8wra
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Martz <m.traynor@ic.ac.uk> For my PGP key, email me with 'Send public key' as subject