Re: RE[2]: virus: Re: Science and Religion

David Leeper (
Tue, 27 Nov 1956 01:42:29 +0000

>And yes, I think 'spirituality' is pseudo, but not necessarily invalid.

An example of a valid pseudo would be....?

>I think we are still looking for a valid definition of the term as it applies
>to CoV.

Spirituality, like art, has no invalid definition. Each subjective definition is valid within
its own context.

>I am a materialist, however, and am still unwilling to separate any spirit from the flesh.

I'll be damned, _another_ genius on this list.

>And I am ready to say, along with many others it seems, that regardless of traditions and past >endeavors, there just ain't any reason not to say bye-bye to religion in any of its forms. >There's more out there, Horatio....

One night a devil stuck His tongue in my ear, and this is what he said:

I say Kill, and thou shalt.
I say Believe, and thou shalt.
I say Love, and thou shalt.
I say Die, and thou shalt.

...and the name of this devil is DNA.

David Leeper
Homo Deus