After all this discussion about AT, OR, TT here He comes who knows
the truth: OR does not exist.
Richard, what do YOU call TT, if I may ask ?
>>Unless the objection is that a
>>statement can't be absolutely true (and hence it can't be true)
>>because all statements are imperfect due to imperfect language,
>>non-sufficient qualification, incomplete description and so on. I
>>think this is the strongest case to be made and I essentially
>>agree. I have tried to define my way around that (see above) in
>>the interest retaining the term Absolute Truth (and hence truth)
>>to make discussion less cumbersome.
>
>Almost. Language isn't imperfect; it's constructed. It's not simply an
>approximation; it's an editorial. You can never have a one-to-one
>correspondence with Objective Reality in language; language is
>one-dimensional.
Jason, you will never be able to understand Level-3!
Unless... you go to Seattle and the Guru personally infects you.
The last chance Space Shuttle to Level-3 is leaving in a few hours!
Second thought: you may be already on your way...
---------------------
Tad Niwinski from TeTa where people grow
3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494
Danger!!!
The Level-3 Hypocrisy Virus (L3HV) is threatening you and your children!
Protect yourself: never talk to an infected person without a condom!