Re: virus: Re : Complexity was TT and Absolute Truth

David McFadzean (david@lucifer.com)
Sat, 7 Dec 1996 18:31:11 -0700

From: zaimoni@ksu.edu
> I would say that the places to attack are:
> 1) #1,2,3,4
> 2) The implication #4 => #5.
>
> I think the implication is MUCH more vulnerable to being false.

The implication is "if memes are not encoded in speech then
memes cannot be transmitted by speech." Why is that unreasonable?
(Keep in mind that despite what you and others have suggested in this
thread, "encoded" does not mean self-contained.)

--
David McFadzean                 david@lucifer.com
Memetic Engineer                http://www.lucifer.com/~david/
Church of Virus                 http://www.lucifer.com/virus/