RE: virus: MEME UPDATE: To Censor Or Not?

Dave Pape (
Tue, 17 Dec 1996 01:07:09 GMT

At 11:39 16/12/96 -0600, Zaimoni wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Dec 1996, Dave Pape wrote:
>> At 00:48 16/12/96 -0600, zaimoni (I'm sure I'll work out whether that's your
>> full name, surname, or what, soon, but for now, excuse me) wrote:
>> >On Mon, 16 Dec 1996, Dave Pape wrote:

Now, I'm going to come out with it: Zaimoni-person... how do you want to be
referred to?

>> >2) I would phrase it as the freedom-consciousness inequalities.
>> Ah! Why? Are we talking Venn diagram overlaps here? Sorry, you're talking to
>> someone who's only been FORGETTING maths for the last 10 years I'm afraid.
>Yes, that's one context to interpret it in.

Good... although I didn't even really understand THAT context... a lucky strike.

>Actually, you don't seem to be forgetting it too fast; I'm interpreting
>the inclusion relation as an underpowered "<". [It isn't always
>defined, but it works properly otherwise....] The technical term
>is "partially ordered set", or "poset".

So... Big set = consciousness, subset = freedom? I was kind of aiming for
freedom being EMPTY set.

There is no such thing as anything.

Phonecalls: 01494 461648 Phights: 10 Riverswood Gardens
High Wycombe
HP11 1H