RE: virus: Incredulity

Dan Plante (
Wed, 19 Mar 1997 19:52:28 -0800

At 04:34 PM 3/19/97 -0800, Richard Brodie wrote:
>David McF wrote:


>>True, but then we can discuss what makes evidence "good" and why
>>calling evidence "good" doesn't make it so and why the Creationist's
>>evidence isn't really good after all.
>And your argument would certainly be one of rationality rather than one
>of revelation.

....implying that revelation cannot be evoked through rational argument?

initial conditions = data (conception)
control of data = information (conception to puberty)
control of information = knowledge (puberty to marriage)
control of knowledge = wisdom (marriage to divorce)