There appears to be at CoV a silly agnosticism that is quite prevalent.
Stuff like "Level 3","all truths are half-truths", "I don't know if there's a
god",etc. get treated as objective, as if there is no difference between
arbitrary assertions and legitimately supported assertions. Such a distinction
could answer Tony's question about the irrefutability of statements like:
> "I FEAR I NEED TO EAT THE QUEENS PUSSY, MEMETICS CAN EMPOWER US"
Pancritical rationalism and objectivism, paradigms in which truth is not
absolute, get mixed up with false paradigms which claim that reality is not
absolute.
-David