> On Fri, 12 Sep 1997, Nathaniel Hall wrote:
>
> > What I mean by implictly is that in order to discover something it
> must
> > be out there to be discovered. That is an objective universe,( which
> is
> > the foundation of objectivism).
>
> Is it conceivable that there could, in some weird Bizzarro-Universe,
> be a
> possible reality in which there were things that could be discovered
> without their identities being absolute outside of the observer? (A
> not
> always = A?)
>
> Is such a universe conceivable?
Only in your dreams!
The Nateman