>I'd certainly agree with that. The problem is in what you
>deleted, which I don't have time to dig out, but which as
>I recall seemed to imply that more than one person has
>to have access to any part of objective reality. I think
>we're talking about verifiability here.
I didn't mean to imply that. I believe that some parts of
objective reality lie entirely outside of anyone's (or any
observer's) perceptions, e.g. I think some stars probably
exist outside the lightcone of any and all conscious observers.
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/