chardin wrote:
> So, I had the wrong Nate, I'm still having to place everybody.
> Did you NOT see Aldrich's interview?
I didn't see the one your referring to. However I've heard him in other interviews where he even
answered questions called in from some hostile listeners. He sounded credible to me.
> He kept admitting that it was
> all allegations, gossip--"matters that need to be further looked
> into." He was not credible. Some of his "sources" were infuriated
> that he would use their name in connection with his "reporting."
> They said they talked with him over a glass of beer and admitted they
> were just gossiping and had no idea the guy would use them in a book.
> Aldrich guy backed down and made himself look like a fool and YOU STILL
> BELIEVE HIM--Nateman, where is your logic!
> check it out: http://www.htcomp.net/123/bgt_book.htm
I went and checked this out. I believe Hilliary is lying when she said she didn't hire Livingston. Not
only was the White house staff very evasive about who hired him but they ended up pinning the blame on
a dead guy. (Poor Vince: He gets all the credit for the rotten things now that he is dead).Hillary is
well known to have been involved with the hiring decisions for much of the White House.My logic is just
fine. Take off your rose colored glasses and see these liars and socialists for the crooks they are!
> He told Tim "allegations that need to be further looked into."
> Whitewater, my goodness, the Republicans have spent $30 million
> dollars to investigate that trailer court project. We could have
> bought everybody in Arkansas a mobile home for that...but don't get
> me started on government spending. . . the Republicans will drain the
> treasury to go after Clinton.
>
Money well spent if it manages to get that nest of crooks out of power. I didn't like Jimmy Carter much
but at least I believed he was a man of honor.The Nateman
--------------A9C7A738261B4AB2D870CEA3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
chardin wrote:
So, I had the wrong Nate, I'm still having to place everybody.I didn't see the one your referring to. However I've heard him in other interviews where he even answered questions called in from some hostile listeners. He sounded credible to me.
Did you NOT see Aldrich's interview?
He kept admitting that it wasI went and checked this out. I believe Hilliary is lying when she said she didn't hire Livingston. Not only was the White house staff very evasive about who hired him but they ended up pinning the blame on a dead guy. (Poor Vince: He gets all the credit for the rotten things now that he is dead).Hillary is well known to have been involved with the hiring decisions for much of the White House.My logic is just fine. Take off your rose colored glasses and see these liars and socialists for the crooks they are!
all allegations, gossip--"matters that need to be further looked
into." He was not credible. Some of his "sources" were infuriated
that he would use their name in connection with his "reporting."
They said they talked with him over a glass of beer and admitted they
were just gossiping and had no idea the guy would use them in a book.
Aldrich guy backed down and made himself look like a fool and YOU STILL
BELIEVE HIM--Nateman, where is your logic!
check it out: http://www.htcomp.net/123/bgt_book.htm
Money well spent if it manages to get that nest of crooks out of power. I didn't like Jimmy Carter much but at least I believed he was a man of honor.The NatemanHe told Tim "allegations that need to be further looked into."
Whitewater, my goodness, the Republicans have spent $30 million
dollars to investigate that trailer court project. We could have
bought everybody in Arkansas a mobile home for that...but don't get
me started on government spending. . . the Republicans will drain the
treasury to go after Clinton.