Re: virus: Teflon vs. Hardon

chardin (chardin@uabid.dom.uab.edu)
Fri, 10 Oct 1997 17:01:30 CST+6CDT


> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 12:50:27 -0600
> From: Nathaniel Hall <natehall@worldnet.att.net>
> To: virus@lucifer.com
> Subject: Re: virus: Teflon vs. Hardon
> Reply-to: virus@lucifer.com

>
>
> Sodom wrote:
>
> > Nathaniel Hall wrote:
> >
> > > > ...and contend that "Slick Willie" is nowhere
> > > > near as slippery as the Teflon President.
> > >
> > > Love him or Hate him you knew what Reagan stood for. What does Bubba
> > > believe
> > > in? Not getting beat up by his wife! I think that qualifies Bubba as
> > > the
> > > slickmiester of the two.
> > >
> > > The Nateman
> >
> > The real difference between Reagan and Clinton is this:
> >
> > Clinton breaks the law for personal gain and power.
> > Reagan broke the law for power and his personal relationship with god.
> > (lower case intentional)
>
> Amen to that brother!The Nateman
> What harks ye from the amen corner? That both Clinton and Reagan
are crooks or that Reagan was breaking the law for his "god" ....that
he really didn't believe in God at all?
>
>