>I think it was Lord Rutherford who compared equations for particles and
>waves, and "just for the fun of it" assumed matter and energy to be the same
>thing, which eventually led to Einstein's E= mc^2. Can we, just for the fun
>of it, think of equalling information to matter and/or energy?
Which in many ways, ties back to the objectivist/sujectivist debate of
walking into rush-hour traffic with one's eyes closed. I didn't see the
car coming... does it hit me? This sort of takes the fun out of equalling
information to matter and energy, even for my extremly loose definition of
information.
~kp