Re: virus: Tad's rule #3d and e

chardin (chardin@uabid.dom.uab.edu)
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 13:26:51 CST+6CDT


> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 12:33:06 -0400 (EDT)
> To: virus@maxwell.lucifer.com
> From: konsler@ascat.harvard.edu (Reed Konsler)
> Subject: virus: Tad's rule #3d and e
> Reply-to: virus@lucifer.com

> >Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 01:12:38 -0700
> >From: Tadeusz Niwinski <tad@teta.ai>
> >
> >40+ lines of quotes, then:
> >
> >>I don't find anything here I disagree with.
>
> I agree with this in principle. There is a problem
> since, unlike conversation, it is not possible to
> use non-verbal cues and pauses in the dialogue
> to gague response.
>
> But, Tad's right, I probably could have skipped
> saying this. I'll see what I can do.
>
> (Does this also count as clutter? Shoot!)
>
> Reed
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Reed Konsler konsler@ascat.harvard.edu
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
Reed, feedback is important--positive and negative. Stand your
ground! You are not being unreasonable! Chardin
>
>