virus: META

Reed Konsler (
Sat, 18 Oct 1997 18:34:28 -0400 (EDT)

>That's what I thought. Will you be kind enough, David, to point out to each
>person who attempts to divide members of this Church (into
>teachers/students, male/female, mature/immature,
>indoctrinated/not-indoctrinated, etc.) as part of their argument, that it is
>not the way this Church operates?
>To be more clear: if one of the members claimed that s/he may be pointing
>out inconsistencies in others without being consistent her/himself,
>*because* s/he is a teacher and not a student here -- that would be not in
>accordance with the Church's rules.

Richard didn't make that statement. He said only a person who insists that
consistency is important ought to be held to standards of consistency.
A person who insists that standards of consistency aren't important
shouldn't be expected to care if you point out inconsistencies.

His comments about being here to help the group grow were not
directly related. You are making a misrepresentation of something
which Eva has already explained...if it wasn't obvious initially.

Is that ethical?


Reed Konsler