I'm actually lost here Brett. Can you honestly claim you can come up with
an experiment to verify your definition above? And isn't Occam rotating
in his grave at your multiplying of entities? (Wade)
List,
What is wrong with finding a process and showing how it is memetic? I would
re-write Occam to say that "the most simple definition of a thing is the
thing itself". And I don't usually find anything wrong with Wade's posts,
it's his undying skepticism that grates on me...enough can never be enough
(to use a "Wadeism"--a negative tautology that implies forward motion--like
"there is no there there...and show me the me-me).
Brett
Returning,
rBERTS%n
Rabble Sonnet Retort
Shaw's Principle:
Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will
want to use it.