Re: virus: Re:Core beliefs

D.H.Rosdeitcher (76473.3041@compuserve.com)
Tue, 23 Dec 1997 19:21:11 -0500


David McF. wrote:

>>energy'. Why would that definition preclude the supernatural anymore
than
>>the current usage of the term does?

>Which current usage?

The current popular usage of existence is as a synonym for reality--what
exists regardless of what we believe exists. 'Patterns instantiated in
matter and energy' can be ambiguous enough to include the supernatural,
just like the current popular usage of 'existence'. --David R.