That a person might be negated to a point of "chaotic" neutrality such
that all possibilities are equally probable would address a. and b. "C"
is dependent on not freedom but intelligence so that "choice" implies a
rationalle. And "physical" method implies not that god created man in
this way, but that man might choose this form of violent opposition to
logic (which book burning, anti-intellectualism, condoned police force,
a work ethic, and a pluralistic or democratic vote on "truth" might
imply-- as well as scientific correlation about null, a social "truth",
and opposition to "faith" as a form of linear reasoning).
What this leaves open to question are:
1. What type of rational choice (truth) does this leave?
2. How does this rationalize the existence of "evil"?
3. How does having this type of chaotic (evil?) *will* suggest that
there would be less evil in the world?
Brett Lane Robertson
Indiana, USA
www.window.to/mindrec
news:alt.pub.coffeehouse.amethyst