Re: virus: religion

MahaIndra (mahaindra@bigfoot.com)
Wed, 15 Apr 1998 22:33:57 -0700


<35343990.77157CCF@qlink.queensu.ca> <3533FB11.6BF91CC2@ix.netcom.com>
<3534C8DD.E8C592A0@ma.ultranet.com> <353527F9.FDE8973C@qlink.queensu.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com

Free will - is this not a method of choosing between the percieved options
before one? This is no attempt to over simplify, but one can not choose an
option they cannot percieve, whether real or imagined.

MahaIndra

Eric Boyd wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Most certainly. But speaking of frame-works, does anybody have a really
> good axiomatic definition of free-will? (like, better than my own ad-lib
> one?) I'm certain that philosophers must have worked a good one out by
> now!
>
> I have been thinking more and more about my proof that creativity requires
> freewill. I'm convinced that it will work. It occured to me that the
> converse -- freewill *requires* creativity -- is one of the TCS axioms.
> What an interesting little thought-space this is turning out to be!
>
> ERiC