Re: virus: Archives

B. Lane Robertson (metaphy@hotmail.com)
Fri, 08 May 1998 12:30:11 PDT

A less structured and more immediate solution is for
interested people to read the archives and
occasionally repost what they consider to be
interesting for whatever reason. Adding "repost" to
the subject would give a search term for later
categorizing items of interest and "repost
(category)" would begin to define some possible ways
of organizing these posts.

>From owner-virus@lucifer.com Fri May 8 10:51:08 1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by maxwell.kumo.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA21023
> for virus-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 11:47:33 -0600
>X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.kumo.com: majordom set sender to
owner-virus@lucifer.com using -f
>Message-ID: <35534501.5FDFB6E5@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu>
>Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 13:46:41 -0400
>From: Paul Prestopnik <pjp66259@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu>
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: virus@lucifer.com
>Subject: Re: virus: Archives
>References: <3.0.5.32.19980506153035.02f4db20@lucifer.com>
<35515B39.ADF6478D@qlink.queensu.ca>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
>
>> If anyone can think of other things we should rate, I'm all ears. As
well,
>> should the ratings be A, B, and C's, or out of five? out of ten?
Some new
>> scheme, based on "memetic badges of merit"?
>>
>> ERiC
>
> maybe more useful than a rating would be a category for the message.
>meta-meme, (can't think of any others),etc. Hopefully while looking
at the
>messages ideas for categories would be more obvious. Also, how would
you
>decide what messages recieve what rating?
>-Paul Prestopnik
>
>
>

B. Lane Robertson
Indiana, USA
http://www.window.to/mindrec
AAA000

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com