It's not impossible, but it implies a terrific
>devotion to a very difficult and, I think, counterproductive, task. Thus
>my "mad genius" remark.
I hadn't understood what you'd meant by that comment. But, as Jake said,
it ain't that difficult.
>I don't claim it's impossible that he's Brett, but I personally am
>satisfied with my conclusion that he's not, because his reasons for
>*claiming to be if he isn't* seem far more convincing to me than the
>postulate that he really has invented Brett out of whole cloth.
Maybe that's what I'm missing. What _are_ Brodie's reasons for claiming to
be Brett when he isn't? Did he post them to this list?
'Truth in advertising' is one of the tenets of CoV... and the question I
have now is, which contradictory version of the truth?
Thanks,
lena
-- Lena Rotenberg lrr@netkonnect.net