-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Russell <frussell@frontiernet.net>
To: virus@lucifer.com <virus@lucifer.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: virus: Virus: Opinions?
>
>
>sodom wrote:
>
>> Johnny Rea wrote:
>>
>> > I don't really understand what you want me to say. I guess you think
that
>> > unless
>> > someone finds the bones of Adam and proves that his DNA was the first
human
>> > DNA on the planet that you won't believe he was the father of all
mankind?
>>
>> First off, i dont know if you have ever heard of RNA before. But if you
had,
>> you would know that there is no father of mankind like you think. That
term
>> does not apply. There is no possible way that a single man was the father
of
>> the species. It is a nice thought though. If someone did find these
bones,
>> which could still exist if they are only a 6000 years old, they would not
be
>> the first human bones or DNA. We have bones and DNA much older than that.
We
>> recently found a whole body that was older than that frozen in ice.
>>
>
>For that matter, Ancient Egypt had a thryving culture in 4002 BC. It
wasn't at its
>height yet, but it certainly wasn't a single couple sitting sitting under a
tree
>eating apples while their kids killed each other.
>
>
>--
>Nathan Russell
>frussell@frontiernet.net
>
>
>"I am confident that the Republicans will pick a nominee that will beat
Bill
>Clinton"
>-Dan Quayle on the 2000 presidential election
>
>
>