> 4000 and 2 bc? where did you get this number?
>
You claimed that the world was created 6000 years ago. 1998-6000=4002. I
appologize, though; since there was no year zero it should be 4003 BC.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Russell <frussell@frontiernet.net>
> To: virus@lucifer.com <virus@lucifer.com>
> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 6:33 PM
> Subject: Re: virus: Virus: Opinions?
>
> >
> >
> >sodom wrote:
> >
> >> Johnny Rea wrote:
> >>
> >> > I don't really understand what you want me to say. I guess you think
> that
> >> > unless
> >> > someone finds the bones of Adam and proves that his DNA was the first
> human
> >> > DNA on the planet that you won't believe he was the father of all
> mankind?
> >>
> >> First off, i dont know if you have ever heard of RNA before. But if you
> had,
> >> you would know that there is no father of mankind like you think. That
> term
> >> does not apply. There is no possible way that a single man was the father
> of
> >> the species. It is a nice thought though. If someone did find these
> bones,
> >> which could still exist if they are only a 6000 years old, they would not
> be
> >> the first human bones or DNA. We have bones and DNA much older than that.
> We
> >> recently found a whole body that was older than that frozen in ice.
> >>
> >
> >For that matter, Ancient Egypt had a thryving culture in 4002 BC. It
> wasn't at its
> >height yet, but it certainly wasn't a single couple sitting sitting under a
> tree
> >eating apples while their kids killed each other.
> >
> >
> >--
> >Nathan Russell
> >frussell@frontiernet.net
> >
> >
> >"I am confident that the Republicans will pick a nominee that will beat
> Bill
> >Clinton"
> >-Dan Quayle on the 2000 presidential election
> >
> >
> >
-- Nathan Russell frussell@frontiernet.net
"I am confident that the Republicans will pick a nominee that will beat Bill Clinton" -Dan Quayle on the 2000 presidential election