virus: The BIG picture.

Nathaniel Hall (natehall@WORLDNET.ATT.NET)
Mon, 13 Jul 1998 08:47:30 -0600


 

Eric Boyd wrote:

Hi,

A more interesting thing to consider is the results of a systematic health
care system.  For instance, what does consistently saving babies that would
other-wise have died do to the continuning ability of the species to
propagate?

How about eye-glasses?  The longer we use them, the more of the population
*needs* to use them!

These and other issues make me wonder about the long term (ten of thousands
of years and up) viability of this thing we call "civilization".  Are we
breeding people who cannot survive without it?  If so, how long until even
our bests efforts will not be able to "cure" the debased gene's of the
culture?

Maybe genetic engineering is not a only likely but a *necessary* step for a
galactic civilization!

ERiC

    Here's the big picture: Life itself is essentially a  competition among variants of self replicating information.  Memes are a much more efficient and competitive replicator than genes. If anything our particular species is in a transition period towards total meme domination as replicators. It doesn't matter really which species evolves  memes as replicators , because whatever one is first quickly out competes the slower evolving gene pools. If that asteroid had not hit the earth 63 million years ago the meme species may very well had been  the descendent of Tyrannosaurus Rex  by now. To worry about genetic imperfections is to miss the big picture, that is , that the evolution of memes is what matters at this point.
 
Nate
surf.to/nateman