>Is it possible that we all acknowledge that the above statement has some
>`objective' validity as a description of the real world? And if so, doesn't
>it behoove us, as the creators of a new religion[1], to understand _why_
>this is the case?
>
>-Prof. Tim
>
>[1] Ahh, yes, wasn't this the purpose of _Church_ of Virus at the offset?
Indeed, that was the purpose at the outset (if not the offset). If science
had all the answers, there would be no need for Virus. Still, one of the
original goals was to create a religion that was consistent with science.
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/