Re: virus: Faith and Mortality

red_mist (red_mist@portsurfer.demon.co.uk)
Tue, 22 Sep 1998 21:11:04 +0100


This is what you say but i bet that you wouldn't say the same thing if
it actually happened. It is natural for people to try to defent the
one's they love, whether it is physical or psycological. Also there is
a difference between someone hurling insults at someone and them stating
their opinions which is a whole different matter.

just the other day someone said my brother was a lazy arsehole. they're
probably right and i accepted that as their opinion and it's true. It's
sometimes difficult to draw the line between insults and stating an
opinion

>No, that is not what i mean. I would let someone hurl insults at my wife, but I
>would not allow it to become physical. My wife is responsible for her own
>psychological defense. I would help if asked, and I might say a thing or two,
>but if she said, "Stay out of it" I would regardless of the overall effects.
>Physical interaction is where I draw the line. At the point where you come into
>physical contact, or threaening physical contact, the right to freedom dies
>regardless of whether it is my wife or an utter stranger. Its not about
>affecting me, its about affecting anyone.
>
>As for psychologically - unless the person was a minor, mentally or emotionally
>incapacitated(depressed for physical reasons, handicapped etc...) I think
>everyone, including those I love, need to be able to defend themsleves
>psychologically. I may jump in and state my mind, but under NO circumstances
>would I do this against the will of the person I cared about.
>
>Why do you find the concept so hard to believe? What seems strange or
>unbelievable about it to you? I was under the impression that my feelings in
>this regard were quite common.
>
>Sodom
>Bill Roh

-- 
red_mist