Re: FW: Babel - Languages - European Creationist Congress

Wed, 30 Aug 95 08:55:00 CDT

I apologize if I have "offended" you in any way, but I thought you might be
interested in this little debate I have been monitoring, for your sake of
research, not for any purposes of evolution v. creation. This is not the
first bit of information I have read concerning ancient linguistics that
generalizes in this manner.
From: David McFadzean
Subject: Re: FW: Babel - Languages - European Creationist Congress
Date: Tuesday, August 29, 1995 16:17PM

At 12:08 PM 8/29/95 CDT, you wrote:
>Very interesting, concerning the Bibles accuracy.
> ----------

>and a four modern languages. The major goal of his talk was to demonstrate
>that modern languages, when compared to their ancient ancestor languages
>from which they derive, have in fact deteriorated over the
>last few thousand years and not evolved into something more sophisticated
>and developed which is what evolutionists would like to have.

Do you know what a "straw man" argument is?
David McFadzean
Memetic Engineer
Merak Projects Ltd.