SK wrote:
(now that I've actually read it)
> Actually, i think an intensive carpet bombing might be a solution.
Finally you show your true colors.
>- Zloduska...you are so literal in your interpretations of what people
Does reality go through a filter on your side of the globe? My
>Starting in Albania then running straight across, through Greece, then
>Turkey, Iraq, Iran, up a little bit so as to get Afghanistan ..next
>would be Pakistan and then...of course the Indian subcontinent. Imagine
>how many potential genocidal situations would be thwarted!
>write (not to mention handles)that i can easily understand how you
>become sufficiently enraged to spew your 'gothic-rebel-secret
>feminist-hoping-to-be-misunderstood-thinker' hate mail...
> But how can you go off the deep end like...all your nasty insults, the
>cursing etc? Seems kind of like misdirected energy to me.
>
> When i said 'Z and i have some sort of love hate thing going...' I
>never imagined you or anyone could have interpreted it as you did. I
>wrote that with a fond memory of your fierceness and confidence....it
>was something i had admired, regardless if you understood what i had
>actually said so long ago. But after this pitiful display of resurgent
>immaturity, i realize that i had horribly overestimated you.
EH?! Fine. Folks, if Sebastian insists on resolving this out in the open,
I might as well give you a sequence of events here:
private email account, with an apology for my tardiness in responding, and
then disclosing some personal information, and recounting the main reason
why we ever argued in the first place. Not to mention that I specifically
pointed out that I did NOT want to engage in anymore trivial battles on or
off the list, and I hoped we could get along. To the tune of:
>by the way...someone please answer this; _zloduska preferably_
>since we have a strange love hate thing going:
>is emminant hatred the result of plaguing Virus with
>occasional jokes and other garbage? the purity of
>material has always amazed me...or am i just a savage?
>Sorry for the late, late reply. I wasn't ignoring you; I haven't had time
>I really don't want to argue with you. I'm over "it" and no
to answer until >just now.
off. I'm not your >friend, or enemy. I'd prefer we just got along. I
don't have the time or inclination to get >upset over the trivial debates
on a mailing list. I'm only answering you so as not to >appear rude. That
said...
>I'm not sure how to answer your question. I don't feel 'hatred' toward
<snip>
>To put this simply and briefly, it's your original post which
<followed down by yet another breakdown of how I saw things>
4) Expecting a reply the next day to the effect, "Oh, I understand now,"
And you have the audacity to tell me , "But after this pitiful
>You are
And that is the reason why you're foaming at the mouth and looking
I am NOT going to let you kindle another flame-war with me, try as you
might in vain. You can stay in that racist bubble you call Home
~kjs
anyone on the >list. Also, what displeasure I do have are not the result
of your 'humorous' stuff >posted to CoV. I don't expect to enjoy what I
read on the list, in fact most of the stuff >bores me to tears because it
is so text book-like and self-indulgent, however it is the >fantastic
friendships that I have forged with the way-cool inhabitants of Church of
>Virus over the past year that keeps me here to stay.
that was the >result of my anger towards you. Now, I HATE dredging up the
past, but I think you're >unclear as to what exactly happened. As
concisely as possible:
>very literate, but i get the sense that you respond only to listen to
>your own voice.