Re: virus: META: Should the list be moderated? (was Fund Raising via 900)

Mike Kirby (mkirby@slaughter.net)
Tue, 28 May 1996 15:05:26 -0400

Personally, I'm for an unmoderated list-- in fact, email Spam(tm),
when it makes its way to the list, might prove for interesting
discussion-- ever thought of the memetic aspects of the Good Times
virus?

Mike Kirby
Web Developer
Wholesale Slaughter
http://slaughter.net
mailto:mkirby@slaughter.net

David McFadzean wrote:
>
> At 11:53 PM 27/05/96 -0700, EASYSTREET BROKERAGE wrote:
> >EARN $1.00 PER MINUTE FOR YOUR ORGANIZATION!!!
>
> A question for the list: would you rather put up with the odd
> spam message like this one, or have a moderated list? One
> disadvantage of having a moderated list (i.e. I would have to
> approve every message that gets sent out) is that traffic on
> the list would stop while I'm away from e-mail access.
>
> I will be at the Java conference in SF until the end of the week.
> Hopefully I will get e-mail access there, but if not I'll be
> back in touch next week.
> --
> David McFadzean david@lucifer.com
> Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/
> Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/