Re: virus: META: Should the list be moderated? (was Fund

ken sartor (
Tue, 28 May 1996 14:51:12 -0500

I perfer the unmoderated list format... so far i see no need
to do otherwise.

At 11:56 AM 5/28/96 -0600, David McFadzean wrote:
>At 11:53 PM 27/05/96 -0700, EASYSTREET BROKERAGE wrote:
>A question for the list: would you rather put up with the odd
>spam message like this one, or have a moderated list? One
>disadvantage of having a moderated list (i.e. I would have to
>approve every message that gets sent out) is that traffic on
>the list would stop while I'm away from e-mail access.
>I will be at the Java conference in SF until the end of the week.
>Hopefully I will get e-mail access there, but if not I'll be
>back in touch next week.
>David McFadzean
>Memetic Engineer
>Church of Virus