Re: virus: META: Should the list be moderated? (was Fund

Bill Godby (wgodby@sun.tir.com)
Wed, 29 May 1996 00:02:33 -0400

I think it's clear that for the time being the odd spam isn't much of a
problem, yet. I'm for staying with the unmoderated for now. I don't
particularly find any redeeming value in them, but if something seems
particularly interesting enough to peak everyones interest so be it.

At 11:56 AM 5/28/96 -0600, David McFadzean wrote:
>At 11:53 PM 27/05/96 -0700, EASYSTREET BROKERAGE wrote:
>>EARN $1.00 PER MINUTE FOR YOUR ORGANIZATION!!!
>
>A question for the list: would you rather put up with the odd
>spam message like this one, or have a moderated list? One
>disadvantage of having a moderated list (i.e. I would have to
>approve every message that gets sent out) is that traffic on
>the list would stop while I'm away from e-mail access.
>
-----
Bill Godby
wgodby@tir.com