virus: Re: Science and Religion

KMO prime (
Wed, 25 Sep 1996 04:18:42 EDT

On Tue, 24 Sep 1996 22:44:21 -0500 (CDT) writes:

>I would much rather ditch the 'spirituality/religiosity' hack term,
>but I
>can't think of a single word that means the content I want.
>'Spirituality' alone is extremely passive, while 'religiosity' is,
>by definition both conventionally and in my frame, POWERLESS. It is
>necessary to avoid the aversive traits of both words. Ideas?

Could you say a bit about why the word 'religiosity' is powerless. Does
the word have a refferent? What do you mean by 'powerless' ?

Take care. -KMO