Re: virus: Pot
Tue, 24 Dec 96 10:28:06 GMT

XYZ issued forth:

> > From:
> > > Wrong. Your fantasy is not a reflection of reality.
> > Now you're twisting words. We're (or at least, I am) merely using this
> > as an example to illustrate how one person can be convinced of something's
> > truth, without having evidence that can be shown to other people.
> > We're moving off the topic of pot a bit here though aren't we?
> Yes you are.

You're the one who's confused, not me.

> > > I've still not seen any aleins and neither have you.
> > That's your opinion only. You can never know whether I've met an alien or not.
> Yes I can : evidence!

Wrong. Just because there is no indication that an event happened, does
not mean that it didn't. The view you are taking seems to be an
existentialist view, are you a supporter of this train of thought.

> Lack of evidence is proof that is was wishful thinking.

You Cretin.

> Your experience means nothing unless it can be validated which it cannot.
> If it cannot be validated, that is proof that you were dreaming.

I don't think many people will be in agreement.

> > > Even mice leave footprints.
> > Not in dry concrete they don't!
> Yes they do! The dust on their feet and the dust on the concrete
> does leave footprints.

And you can spot these footprints?

> > > > Ha, I'll bet I'm younger than you.
> > I'm not going to put a fix on your age for 3 very important reasons. They
> > are as follows:
> Backing down so quickly?

Not at all, I stated plenty of quite reasonable reasons why I was not going
to state your age.

Has anyone else noticed that XYZ delets bits of posts, and ignores them, if they
are in any way detrimental to him/her?
Flaps has. It could be to do with the fact that XYZ is talking crap so he tries to hide it all.
> > > If you can't do that, then everyone will know that you are
> > > just a bluffer.
> > And you're not?
> And I just proved that...

I'm obviously not paying enough attention, because as far as I can tell most of
this post from you is a blatant falsity.

> > But learning is all about how to think literally and laterally, isn't it?
> > That's what I'm here to do, and if you've got a problem with that, then I
> > suggest that you might be better off unsubscribing from this list.
> How would that help you think more logically?

Well, for a start it would mean that I could concentrate on more worthwhile
threads, rather than this almost meaningless psychological banter.

> > So how old are you, then?
> I thought you said you knew?

Yuo were not paying enough attention, XYZ. I said [approximately]:

"I'll bet I'm younger than you"

Which is different, at least in my books, to saying that I'm younger than you.
I certainly *did not* say that I knew how old you are.

Is your grasp of English insufficient to realise this, or are you trying
to trick me into something?

Please read the posts more carefully in future if you wish to make
decent responses, otherwise you're just wasting mine, and everyone
else on this lists' time, not to mention the 'phone bill.

Richard Jones
"We are the New Breed,
We are the Future."

----- End Included Message -----