Re: virus: Re: Open Thinking

Corey A. Cook (
Fri, 04 Apr 97 16:36:28 CT

I wrote:
>If signal distance is a place
>for error during inter-cranial communication, the same might
>be true for intra-cranial communication. The closer that
>the versions of mindspeak and speech being used are, the
>lower the chance for error. ?Si?

Tony replied:
>Si. I reckon talking things through with one's inner-voice helps
>bring mindspeak and speech to a basin of attraction. (this is just
>thinking about what one wants to say before sayoing it.)

Good point, but not the one I was trying to make. I was trying to
steer the conversation towards the conclusion that a new spoken
language might need to be developed in order to more accuratly
translate from mindspeak to speech.

I guess.

Corey A. Cook

* Zen parables don't count. *