>Agreed. however, instead of calling Karma a [mistaken] myth, why don't
>we try to understand what the idea is trying to get at? What I'm saying is,
>instead of falsifying the vague term, why not determine in what sense
>we belive it to be true?
Why don't you try giving me the "benefit of the doubt" and "interpret
my ideas in the best possible light"? You might be surprised.
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/