RE: virus: Re: Social Metaphysics

Tim Rhodes (
Thu, 25 Sep 1997 09:57:15 -0700 (PDT)

On Thu, 25 Sep 1997, David McFadzean wrote:

> That is hard to believe, since I tried to explain what
> I meant by "objectively real" and there is no consensus
> on what everyone else means by "real". How could they
> be the same?

Hmmm,... you talked about what was "objectively real" and each person had
a different view of what "real" meant, therefore how could your
"objectively real" be the consensus "real"?

Interesting. (Especially after you remove the quotation marks!)

-Prof. Tim