virus: META: No appointed priests yet

Tadeusz Niwinski (
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 18:59:09 -0700

David wrote:
>At 10:44 PM 10/16/97 -0700, Tadeusz Niwinski wrote:
>>In other words to spread your propaganda and use this list as your marketing
>>area. I don't think it is a valid reason to be on this list.
>If you don't like marketing propaganda, then don't read it. You are free
>to read or delete any message on the list.

I know, and you know I know. If this is your subtle way of telling me to be
more polite, I agree. Sorry.

The problem with p. and marketing is that you often don't know it is... what
it is until you have read it.

When I think of it, I have nothing against *using* this list *also* as a
marketing area, but a fair price one should pay for it is to participate as
an equal member.

>This church has no appointed priests. (Yet :-)

Does Richard know about it?

>>I don't think it's fair to divide this list into teachers and students. If
>>this is the intention of the list owner i would like to know about it.
>We are all teachers and students. (At least everyone that posts and reads

That's what I thought. Will you be kind enough, David, to point out to each
person who attempts to divide members of this Church (into
teachers/students, male/female, mature/immature,
indoctrinated/not-indoctrinated, etc.) as part of their argument, that it is
not the way this Church operates?

To be more clear: if one of the members claimed that s/he may be pointing
out inconsistencies in others without being consistent her/himself,
*because* s/he is a teacher and not a student here -- that would be not in
accordance with the Church's rules.

Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa (604) 985-4159