Re: virus: necessary reason

David McFadzean (david@lucifer.com)
Thu, 06 Nov 1997 09:26:10 -0700


At 02:53 AM 11/6/97 -0500, Brett Lane Robertson wrote:

>The proof for sufficient reason seems to say: given x; x either exists or
>doesn't exist; either way there has to be a reason for x existing or not
>existing...it cannot be shown that x does not exist so therefore x exists.
>In what state does x exist?

PSR implies that if x is possible then x must exist. I don't buy it.

--
David McFadzean                 david@lucifer.com
Memetic Engineer                http://www.lucifer.com/~david/
Church of Virus                 http://www.lucifer.com/virus/