Re: virus: _____ of Virus

David McFadzean (
Mon, 24 Nov 1997 15:30:22 -0700

At 01:51 PM 11/24/97 +0000, Ken Kittlitz wrote:

>I interpreted your remark as implying that Law was opposed to human nature
>*in toto*, though that might not have been the intent. (As an aside, your
>comments are frequently so terse that the reader is left guessing at what
>you're trying to say.)

If you have that much latitude, why do you choose to interpret my
remarks such that you disagree with them?

>True enough, though probably the same can be said for every facet of law.
>Was your point that the term "human nature" is vacuous?

My point is that it is not necessarily stupid to advocate something that
goes against some part of "human nature" (whatever that is).

David McFadzean       
Memetic Engineer      
Church of Virus