Re: virus: Spirituality-Science Compatibility

Brett Lane Robertson (unameit@tctc.com)
Sat, 29 Nov 1997 21:14:36 -0500


At 06:21 AM 11/29/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Robin wrote:
>> I'm not looking for debate right now, but rather
>> expressions of interest, and ideas for what might
>> be incorporated. I'm certainly open to suggestions
>> of a snappier name than Spirituality-Science
>> Compatibility!
>
>I'm interested (but you knew that!)
>
>"Sciality"
>"Spirence"
>"digital dharma dream" -- http://goertzel.org/ben/uni0.html
>"Technoshamanism" -- (a web search yields lots on this one)

I use the original term "Psycho-Social Metaphysics" to imply an objective
(scientistic) phenomenon at the juncture of the psychological and the
sociological which is conained in the "physics" of "metaphysics"...meta
implying the physics of physics (or the psychological of psychology, or the
sociological of the social...etc.). I have asked Yahoo to include the
category under "Philosophy, Metaphysics" in the directory...with no response
yet. I also have some interesting theories which fall under this idea and
which cannot be properly classified using any of the terms alone...so I
would have some contributions to the site. Interested?

Brett

Returning,
rBERTS%n
http://www.tctc.com/~unameit/makepage.htm

What if everything is an illusion and nothing exists? In
that case, I definitely overpaid for my carpet.

Woody Allen, "Without Feathers"