RE: virus: Spirituality-Science Compatibility

Robin Faichney (
Sun, 30 Nov 1997 20:48:56 -0000

> From: Brett Lane Robertson[]
> At 06:21 AM 11/29/97 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Robin wrote:
> >> I'm not looking for debate right now, but rather
> >> expressions of interest, and ideas for what might
> >> be incorporated. I'm certainly open to suggestions
> >> of a snappier name than Spirituality-Science
> >> Compatibility!
> >
> >I'm interested (but you knew that!)
> >
> >"Sciality"
> >"Spirence"
> >"digital dharma dream" --
> >"Technoshamanism" -- (a web search yields lots on this one)
> I use the original term "Psycho-Social Metaphysics" to imply an
> objective
> (scientistic) I
> would have some contributions to the site. Interested?
Hmm... not sure how you visualise this. I'm not looking
for contributions. Occasionally, I might ask someone if
I can put up something they have written. Even less
often, I might ask someone if they would like to write
something on a particular topic. But outside of the list
archives (if any), I expect almost all of it to be "from
my pen". What I *am* looking for, from people here
among others, are ideas for (a) links to related sites,
(b) what I might write about, and (c) (probably most
importantly) how I might change and expand my own
ideas. If you'd like to influence the contents of the site,
you'll have to influence me!

That may sound rather authoritarian, but I really am
interested in promoting this science/religion
compatibility thing, and as far as the links to other
sites, and relevant information generally, are
concerned, it will be wide open. I guess what I'm
saying is that, as far as *original*, unavailable
elsewhere stuff is concerned, it will be mine, or at
least have to have my full approval -- apart, as I
say, from the list archives.