Re: Re: virus: May 5, 2000

B. Lane Robertson (metaphy@hotmail.com)
Fri, 29 May 1998 11:38:35 PDT

Math uses symbols to embody certain relationships. That the process can
be accomplished in reverse should not be suspicious (that something
embodied might be applied to a symbol of "math" and thereby reduced to
a--valid-- relationship). So, if I notice certain objective facts and
apply these facts to a system of math (which is also embodied in our
system of marking time); then, the facts-- to the extent that they
follow a relationship-- should also be mathematically deducible through
the symbolic resolution of the system of dates). This is not to say
that the dates produce the experience, or that the experience creates
contingencies which force a correspondence to specific dates... but that
both dates and experiences are symbolic of a mathematically confirmable
relationship.

As such, the reducing of certain dates to formulas and the reduction of
certain historical facts to relationships... and the further correlation
of these relationships to these dates which utilize this "formulary
correlation"* suggests that the fulfilling of such "prophecy" might
verify the accuracy of this correlation. Using mayan, christian,
egyptian, celtic, Indian, (and even "Atlantean") systems of dating and
correlating this with the true or fictionalized accounts of that
civilization-- and then cross-checking the suggested formulas between
these systems (especially if some of these formulas have been
historically validated)-- *can* give an accurate predictive quality to a
particular dating system as regards future manifestations of this
underlying "formulary relationship".

*this suggests that "prophecy" might be represented mathematically as:
Ontological "correlation" (as in a longitudinal study).

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com