Re: virus: Locker Room Talk

brandon fenton (b_randum@hotmail.com)
Thu, 25 Jun 1998 11:16:20 PDT


Eric,
There's more than tow sides to every story.There's yours, mine, and the
truth, which is nothing more than a perseption

>From owner-virus@lucifer.com Wed Jun 24 14:48:14 1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by maxwell.kumo.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA03941
> for virus-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jun 1998 15:42:10 -0600
>X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.kumo.com: majordom set sender to
owner-virus@lucifer.com using -f
>Message-ID: <3591CD2A.33530191@qlink.queensu.ca>
>Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 00:08:10 -0400
>From: Eric Boyd <6ceb3@qlink.queensu.ca>
>Organization: Religious Engineers Inc.
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: virus@lucifer.com
>Subject: Re: virus: Locker Room Talk
>References: <006a01bd9f00$69941250$42e11dc3@iwrso>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
>
>Hi,
>
>"Davorin Mestric" <davorin.mestric@zg.tel.hr> asks:
>> who said that person who can hold two conflicting world
>> views at the same time is a genius?
>
>On this list, that would have to be Brodie... let's see here... ah yes.
>
>"Level 3 is characterized by the ability to flex your meme-space on
>the fly; to use multiple models depending upon your purpose and
>priorities. It's possible to gain an intellectual understanding of
>what this means from Level 2, but probably not possible to really
>feel the impact of the difference in life experience. The Level-3
>mind has a great capacity to hold dissonant, contradictory beliefs.
>(Einstein was said to have this ability.)" -- Richard Brodie
>
>If I were you, I'd ignore everything that Brodie has to say. Read it,
>perhaps, but don't put any weight on it! Level-3 strikes me as nothing
but
>holding "Double-Think" as a virtue... as if that isn't the quickest way
to
>intellectual death!
>
>> when people argue, they will look for reasons why one side is
>> right, and other wrong. and there will be many reasons. so
>> after a fight, two sides usually come out with even stronger
>> beliefs. so, don't fight, but agree to the other side.
>
>Another alternative is to debate THE OTHER SIDE. You'd be surprised
how
>easy it is, once you have been assigned to it... Although only one side
is
>right (true), it always helps to have a through understanding of BOTH
sides
>before making a decision.
>
>ERiC
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com