No, the objective world is the world of objects as
perceived by we subjects. To assume that "objective
world" = "the universe" is to beg the question, to
assume the consequent. Depending, of course, on
what you mean by "universe" -- I've been taking it to
mean "all that is", in which case it certainly does
not equate to "the objective world", because that, by
definition, excludes subjects.
>And this- "that for which the objective world exists" is indeed a
>statement of the supernatural- that which is 'other' to the universe.
Nope, only other to the objective world. (And not
even that, given the Klein Bottle analogy. BTW, if
you do a web search on "Klein Bottle", you get some
fascinating stuff!)
>And as far as I know, clothes have to be made of materials.
So you have to be a materialist to use materials?
Try telling that to the cathedral builders!
-- Robin